05-09-2025
Outdated legal obligations no longer meet consumer needs
PostNL CEO Pim Berendsen commented: “For many years, all postal workers have done their utmost to ensure a responsible and high-quality postal service in the Netherlands. We have done so in the face of a structural mail volume decline of 8% to 10% annually. PostNL has continuously looked for ways to keep postal services both affordable and feasible, for example by closing locations and adapting operational processes. These measures have led to a substantial cost reduction over the years. We have now reached the limits of what PostNL can do within an outdated legal framework that no longer reflects societal needs. There is broad agreement on the urgent need to revise the legislation. However, a solution requires political will and decisiveness. And that is lacking right now.”
Public service has become loss-making and unworkable
Today, postal services are structurally loss-making due to the high costs linked to the current USO framework. PostNL is responsible for collecting and delivering mail from over 10,000 orange mailboxes five days a week, with at least 95% of items required to be delivered within one business day. Without these obligations, PostNL would organise its network and operations differently.
To cover the additional costs of these legal obligations, PostNL requested subsidies of €30 million for 2025 and €38 million for 2026. The minister rejected this request. PostNL has objected to this decision and, given the urgency, also applied for an advance payment on the subsidy through preliminary relief proceedings. Today, the court rejected this request. As a result, PostNL is now forced to formally request the withdrawal of its USO designation.
Minister’s proposal not viable
The minister recently proposed extending the delivery timeframe to two, and over time three days. Even if implemented, this would come too late and would not solve the structural cost issue that exists now and will continue in the years to come. The proposed delivery standard of 95% is also unrealistic in practice, given the labour-intensive nature of mail delivery. The proposal offers no financial compensation for the substantial costs PostNL is required to bear, meaning the postal service as a whole will remain structurally loss-making. This is economically unsustainable. Furthermore, implementation is surrounded by political uncertainty, as highlighted once again in the recent roundtable discussion in Parliament on the future of mail delivery.
Difficult decision
PostNL emphasises that it has engaged in dialogue for years to seek an acceptable solution for all parties. Berendsen: “Filing this request was not an easy decision, but we are left with no alternative. Continuing in this way is no longer viable or responsible. The mounting losses caused by the USO obligations not only threaten the continuity of the postal service but also limit the development of our e-commerce business.”
Request for response within two months
PostNL asks the minister to respond to the request within two months. This timeline aligns with the minister's expected decision on PostNL's appeal against the rejection of the subsidy at the beginning of November. It is now up to the minister to provide a clear perspective for the future of the postal market and to propose an adequate solution for the USO. PostNL will determine its next steps based on the minister’s decision.
Source: PostNL